Notice: Trying to get property 'name' of non-object in /home/thecrofo/public_html/wp-content/themes/Avada-Child-Theme/archive.php on line 19

Notice: Trying to get property 'taxonomy' of non-object in /home/thecrofo/public_html/wp-content/themes/Avada-Child-Theme/archive.php on line 33

Notice: Trying to get property 'term_id' of non-object in /home/thecrofo/public_html/wp-content/themes/Avada-Child-Theme/archive.php on line 34
2008 – The CRO Forum

Yearly Archives: 2008

|2008

Position Paper on Critical Information Structure

The Emerging Risks Initiative of the Chief Risk Officers Forum is pleased to announce the publication of a new position paper called Critical Information Infrastructure. In industrialised societies, computers are interconnected to form a complex communication mesh, characterised by common hubs servicing dispersed users. This interconnectivity is called “network infrastructure”. The rapid transmission and processing of data, using network infrastructure, is critical to the well being of both producers and consumers. Network failure has the potential for serious economic and social impacts. We hope you will find this paper both informative and helpful in managing Critical Information Infrastructure risks.

2008-11-28T12:16:34+00:00November 28th, 2008|

Addressing the pro-cyclical nature of Solvency II

Risk capital charges in the Solvency II context reflect the 99.5% quantile on a 1-year horizon. The consistent application of risk capital charges in Solvency II to all sources of risk is imperative. Inconsistent application of risk charges creates perverse incentives for certain asset classes or insurance products.

2008-11-25T08:06:17+00:00November 25th, 2008|

Public risk discl. under Solvency II

as a basis for discussion on the implementing measures for articles 50-55 of the EU Solvency II Draft Directive. The CRO Forum advocates a principles-based approach: Section B of this paper establishes five main principles for public risk disclosure which should be adhered to by all undertakings.

2017-05-10T20:05:29+00:00November 17th, 2008|

CRO Forum QIS4 Benchmark Study

The CRO Forum companies have developed internal capital models, which they expect to be approved by the regulators as a basis for setting the level of target capital ('SCR'). The CRO Forum companies have also participated in QIS4.

2008-10-31T08:27:14+00:00October 31st, 2008|

New: Best Risk Management Practices

The CRO Forum is pleased to announce a new initiative called Best Risk LManagement Practices. Through our group of large international companies, we are working together to identify best risk practices and sharing our views though these publications with the hope to strengthen risk management practices in the (re)insurance industry and improve the knowledge of risk professionals globally.

2017-05-10T20:05:29+00:00October 29th, 2008|

Liquidity Risk Management

This paper is part of a series of work by the CRO Forum under their Best Risk Management Practices initiative.The paper outlines important principles and considerations that should be part of best risk management practice for the management of liquidity risk within an insurance company. The primary focus of this paper is the management of liquidity risk where the company bears the risk, as opposed to the policyholder.

2008-10-29T08:35:45+00:00October 29th, 2008|

CRO Forum response on the credit crisis

Financial Crisis strongly reinforces the case for Solvency II. EU should not water down the Solvency II directive or postpone the legislative process New CRO Forum publication comments on the consequences of the financial crisis forEnterprise Risk Management and regulation in the insurance industry

2017-05-10T20:05:29+00:00October 23rd, 2008|

Market Value of Liabilities for Insurance Firms

Over the past 3-4 years a tremendous amount of positive energy and resource has been expended in the name of improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the oversight of insurance entities, globally, by regulatory and supervisory bodies, industry associations and commentators alike. The CRO Forum is pleased at the pace and direction of the changes under consideration. However it has also become clear that in the course of the wider dialogue, confusion has sometimes arisen about the intended meaning about certain principles and elements of suggested implementation frameworks. Moreover, parallel discussions in the field of financial accounting have meant some terminology has dual meanings.

2008-07-28T08:42:26+00:00July 28th, 2008|

European harmonization of reporting formats

Thank you for your letter dated 3 June 2008 asking for our views on the European harmonisation of reporting formats. I am pleased to provide you with the CRO Forum answers on your specific questions. Concerning your first question; we agree that the suggested timetable should be in line with the Solvency II project. There are many good reasons for this. Firstly, the current framework differs across jurisdictions and the underlying data is not consistent as Members States apply different valuation bases. Therefore, using the current fragmented supervisory landscape as a starting point for a European wide reporting format would not be appropriate and we need the harmonization of principles that Solvency II brings.

2017-05-10T20:05:29+00:00July 1st, 2008|